Pictured above: Michelle Craven
With Apple due to launch iCloud at its annual developers'
conference in San Francisco next week, Michelle Craven, a director
in the Commerce & Technology team at Nelsons, urges businesses
to be aware of potential risks alongside the efficiencies offered
by "Cloud" Computing services.
Cloud Computing is one of the most recent growth areas of IT and
it is anticipated that it will continue to grow to reach revenues
in the region of $150 billion in the next two years. Commenting on
the efficiencies offered, Michelle says: "It is thought that most
organisations rarely use more than 15% of the computing power which
is available on their desk top computers. Using the "Cloud" could
allow a business to pay just for that 15%, whilst at the same time
having access to almost unlimited resources for when they are
needed.
"This is all positive stuff but the "Cloud" also raises
questions about reliability and risk. Whilst as an individual you
may be prepared to put personal information about yourself on the
web, businesses should think very carefully about the implications
of passing over control of certain critical functions. At the
very least, if entering into a "Cloud" type arrangement, new
agreements with their IT provider will be required and these will
inevitably be more complex than the traditional service level
agreements."
According to Michelle, there is a risk that "Cloud" deals may
not be as flexible as businesses would like. Businesses not only
need to be sure that data put in the "Cloud" can be retrieved as
quickly as possible, says Michelle, but they should also be asking
the cloud provider how they can guarantee confidentiality,
accessibility and how they intend to maintain the integrity of the
data. Industry accreditations held by the provider should be
scrutinised as well as whether or not they have a proven track
record.
"There is then also the spiky issue relating to data
protection," says Michelle, "as the business will no longer be
certain where its data is stored, a serious question when it comes
to considering compliance with Data Protection law."
The eighth data protection principle in the Data Protection Act
of 1998 states that data controllers (the companies using the
"Cloud" service) are not allowed to transfer personal data outside
of the European Economic Area countries, unless the country to
which the data is being transferred 'ensures an adequate level of
protection for the rights and freedoms of data subjects in relation
to the processing of personal data'.
Michelle advises: "The first option available to a data
controller to ensure he or she complies with the Act while using
Cloud Computing is to obtain the relevant person's consent before
sending their data into the "Cloud". Another option would be
to anonymise all the data which would mean that it is not personal
data, but this is not always feasible. Neither of these solutions
seem ideal.
"The third option would be to agree a contract with the Cloud
provider which would include a set of model clauses which have been
approved by the European Commission. These model clauses, however,
are complex and it is anticipated that if the business engaging the
Cloud provider is a small organisation then the provider would just
refuse to agree to them. As it stands, most Cloud providers are
reluctant to agree to the stringent Data Protection Clauses and the
contracts offered are offered very much on a "take it or leave it"
basis."
Michelle confirms that there is a move to try and tackle the
problem by the establishment of the Common Assurance Metric (CAM),
an initiative to produce quantifiable standards that will enable
Cloud providers to demonstrate that they have attained a particular
standard.
CAM was launched on Monday 7th February and is supported by key
industry players such as Microsoft. "What it would mean for
businesses contemplating entering into a "Cloud" arrangement," says
Michelle, "is that rather than having to go through an in-depth
investigation into each potential provider, the business would be
able to see the CAM rating which is held by that provider. However,
whilst CAM does have the potential to offer a certain level of
reassurance, it will not resolve the problem of compliance with the
Data Protection Act. It may be that a change in Data Protection
legislation is required and this does seem to have been
acknowledged by the Information Commissioner. However, it must be
recognised that legislation is always behind technology and cannot
be implemented over night."
Encouraging businesses to acknowledge and analyse the risk to
their business, Michelle concludes: "It is, therefore, an issue of
risk and judgment that each business will have to take on board
before moving to the "Cloud". It is inevitable as time goes on that
the level of services offered by the "Cloud" will increase, the
costs will go down and generally businesses will find themselves
getting more comfortable with the practice. In the meantime, it is
hoped that regulators and legislators alike, working with groups
such as CAM, will catch up with technology and work out what is
considered to be good practice on the Cloud."