Nearly a quarter of Conservative and one-third of Liberal
Democrat councillors do not support the Localism Bill, new research
has revealed.
Unsurprisingly only six per cent of Labour councillors are in
favour of localism. And with Labour expected to increase its seats
at the next local election, the number of councillors opposed to
the bill is likely grow.
This is a worrying statistic for what is one of the Government's
major policies.
The research, which included a survey of 400 councillors from
across the UK, including 31 in the West Midlands, and 2,000 members
of the general public, was unveiled at CB Richard Ellis' third
annual Government & Infrastructure conference.
Of the 2,000 members of the public surveyed, four in five (78
per cent) thought that their local area was just right or already
over-developed, suggesting that NIMBYism could be a significant
barrier to new development.
A poll of 200 senior property industry professionals conducted
at the conference also highlighted NIMBYism concerns. Nearly half
(46 per cent) warned that localism would increase NIMBYism and
subsequently make it harder to bring forward the new developments
needed to encourage growth.
The Government has implemented a raft of incentives to offset
cuts and encourage councils to pursue economic growth through new
development, including the £1.4 million Regional Growth Fund
(RGF), New Homes Bonus (NHB) and Enterprise Zones.
However industry experts warned that the funding for the
incentives is insufficient, with 58 per cent agreeing that the RGF
does not provide access to sufficient cash to make a genuine
difference, and only 27 per cent agreeing that the NHB is
sufficiently generous.
Philip Scott, the Birmingham-based head of planning for the
regions at CB Richard Ellis, said: "The proposed new planning laws
within the Bill have been lauded as a potential charter for the
NIMBY lobby. In reality, I suspect it is more likely to be a
charter that results in more bureaucracy, frustration and
disappointment.
"At a time when many local authorities and community groups are
seeing income reduced and are being forced to review their
resources and front-line staff, loading another new initiative onto
them seems perverse and ill-conceived, particularly when it's local
authorities who are likely to get the flak when the system grinds
to a halt.
"The Government needs to win over a greater number of
councillors and the general public to ensure this important policy
is successfully embraced. The incentives that have been introduced
are a step in the right direction but funding for those incentives
now needs to be increased to ensure these measures have a real
impact on economic growth."