The British Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, has finally entered
the debate on UK immigration policy and what could have been his
opportunity to address and set out the positive benefits to the UK
economy of immigration and the UK's position in the global
economy.
Thalej Vasishta, business immigration law expert and Founder and
Managing Director of international specialist immigration legal
practice, Paragon Law in Nottingham, comments: "The speech was a
knee-jerk reaction to the current live debate following the BNP's
rise in the media and a very apparent concern on the part of the
Labour party and their leader that they are under threat of losing
the 'white working class' vote to the BNP.
"There appears to be no clear policy or strategy adopted in
Gordon Brown's speech as to why he has put forward certain
proposals.
"A classic example of this is that Mr Brown announced that
Labour would review student visas so that only those coming to the
UK to study degree or post-graduate courses would be allowed to
enter. This completely goes against recognising that British
education is one of our most successful exports, contributing
£10bn to the income of UK universities, colleges and schools
collectively.
"Paragon Law has been working with a number of schools and
further education colleges on their strategy to recruit
international students. The income that these institutions receive
from international student fees is the difference between survival
and not. Many colleges and schools are developing 5 - 10 year
strategies on international recruitment based on previous
assurances by this government that they want to encourage students
from countries such as India, Nigeria and so on, to choose the UK
as a place to study. It is apparent that in making this
announcement the government has not consulted with this part of the
education sector.
"Another reason that Gordon Brown has been compelled to speak
about immigration is because of the criticism of his government's
failure on immigration control which is going to result in the UK
population increasing to 70 million. Gordon Brown's response in an
interview with the Daily Mail was to simply dismiss that the UK's
population would increase to this level.
"I would argue that a population increase is not a bad thing for
the UK economy. Whether you are a house builder, a landlord of
properties, a retailer, a restaurant, private school or for that
matter in any business you need consumers to market to, a larger
consumer market means a greater opportunity to sell your products.
After all is this not one of the main reasons that global business
is looking at China and India as a place to set up? Forward looking
businesses are looking at opportunities in India and China because
of the size of their population. These are big consumer markets to
go after and which make up one third collectively of the world's
population.
"Indeed the sole reason why China and India have not been
affected by the global economic downturn is because their domestic
markets are so large that they are not dependant on having to sell
their goods and services abroad.
"Moreover, the UK needs a clear and effective policy on ensuring
that the UK population grows properly and in line with what
demographic changes necessitate. There is an aging population in
the UK; in the next 10 years 50 percent of the UK population will
be of retirement age or over. The fastest growing age group in the
UK is the over 80s which will soon make up 25 percent of the UK's
population.
"These demographic changes do not sit comfortably with the UK
being competitive in a global economic market. We need to attract
the best talent to the UK and ensure that our strategies and
policies are in place to ensure that this starts now. There is a
global war on talent and we are competing with other aging
economies such as the USA and the rest of the Western European
countries for this talent.
"The UK government needs to give careful consideration on not
restricting British businesses from being able to attract the best
talent from abroad. Many of these businesses are now finding it
difficult recruiting from within the resident domestic market and
are having to rely on finding skilled workers from abroad in order
to remain competitive. British business should be allowed to
continue, in line with market forces, to be able to look for the
best talent from abroad if this is not available in the UK. This
problem for British business is going to become more apparent as
the population ages.
"The UK will be better served in stealing the march on
attracting the best talent, investors, entrepreneurs and business
to the UK and the UK should market itself as the place to be. If we
do not do this now we will regret this in 10 years time. There are
only a certain number of businesses in the UK whose target consumer
market is the over 50s!
"London, Nottingham, Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham and Leicester
are all successful global cities because of their ethnic diversity,
because of the coming together of different ideas and conversely
different businesses attracting larger consumer markets. For Gordon
Brown to say that the only benefit to the UK economy is that it has
made it easier for us to find a plumber is very offensive to those
who have come to this country and contributed to this country's
success and in many cases more so than 80 percent of the indigenous
UK population. The government should celebrate the success that
Indian, Pakistani, American, African and so forth entrepreneurs
from other areas have made to their local economies in the UK.
There are many thousands of examples to choose from.
"To suggest that the immigrant community do not accept the
responsibilities or the rights that come with living here is
equally offensive. Not obeying the law, not being able to speak
English and not making a contribution to the UK economy is equally
a social problem which is concentrated in large pockets of the UK
where there are no migrant communities. However, this should
not be about dividing the people of Great Britain but rather
bringing people together, in order to contribute to the success of
the UK in their own way. Such statements by government ministers
are very often picked up by the foreign media who understandably
report such comments in a negative light and quite often in their
press portray the UK as a place which does not want to do business
with the outside world.
"I have met Chinese and Indian nationals who have echoed such
concerns and the consequence being that they have looked at other
counties such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and USA to set up
in business. We as a nation can not afford to lose such
opportunities.
"As the election comes closer, the immigration debate will
become more heated and if polls are correct immigration policy will
be either number 1, 2 or 3 on the electorates' mind when deciding
where to cast their vote. It is therefore extremely important that
those who are able to do so, through experience, address the
balance in respect of the negative press which is being led by the
right wing newspapers. It is important to give the electorate a
proper and balanced position of the benefits of immigration to the
UK. The government and opposition are failing to do this in fear of
losing votes and this will for the reasons outlined in this article
have a negative affect on the UK economy."